+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Qwen2 72B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 42.4% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2 72B was developed as the flagship model in the Qwen2 generation, designed to provide advanced language understanding with 72 billion parameters. Built to deliver strong performance across diverse tasks, it represented a significant advancement in Qwen's model capabilities when introduced.
7 months newer
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-07-23
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Average Score:84.8%(+42.4%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Average Score:42.4%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Avg Score:84.8%(+42.4%)
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Avg Score:42.4%
Providers:0