Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 18.4% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 262.5K more tokens in context window than QwQ-32B-Preview. QwQ-32B-Preview is $17.65 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ 32B Preview was introduced as an early access version of the QwQ reasoning model, designed to allow researchers and developers to experiment with advanced analytical capabilities. Built to gather feedback on reasoning-enhanced architecture, it represents an experimental step toward more thoughtful language models.
2 months newer

QwQ-32B-Preview
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-11-28

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

QwQ-32B-Preview
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

QwQ-32B-Preview
QwQ-32B-Preview
2024-11-28
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

QwQ-32B-Preview

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

QwQ-32B-Preview

QwQ-32B-Preview
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Hyperbolic
Together