Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4.1 leads with 4.5% higher average benchmark score. Claude Haiku 4.5 offers 32.0K more tokens in context window than Claude Opus 4.1. Claude Haiku 4.5 is $84.00 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5, released by Anthropic in October 2025, is a fast, efficient large language model from the Claude 4.5 family optimized for high-throughput, low-latency workloads. It features a 200K token context window, 64K maximum output tokens, native image understanding, and extended thinking capabilities. Haiku 4.5 targets latency-sensitive applications such as real-time assistants, document classification, and lightweight agentic tasks where rapid response times are a primary requirement.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1, released by Anthropic in August 2025, is a large language model from the Claude 4 family optimized for demanding reasoning, multi-step coding, and extended analysis tasks. It features a 200K token context window, 32K maximum output tokens, native image understanding, and extended thinking capabilities. Opus 4.1 targets complex problem-solving, multi-turn reasoning workflows, and applications requiring deep analysis with integrated tool use.
1 month newer

Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
2025-10-01
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Opus 4.1
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Opus 4.1
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Opus 4.1
Claude Opus 4.1
2025-01
Claude Haiku 4.5
2025-02
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
AWS Bedrock
Google Cloud Vertex AI
Claude Opus 4.1
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Opus 4.1
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
AWS Bedrock
Google Cloud Vertex AI