Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads with 16.2% higher average benchmark score. Claude Haiku 4.5 offers 137.9K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-R1-0528. DeepSeek-R1-0528 is $3.35 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. DeepSeek-R1-0528 is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5 continues Anthropic's tradition of fast, efficient models in the fourth generation Claude family. Designed to maintain the hallmark speed and cost-effectiveness of the Haiku line while incorporating advancements from the Claude 4 series, it serves applications requiring rapid processing and quick turnaround times.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528 represents a specific release iteration of the DeepSeek-R1 model, developed to incorporate refinements and improvements from ongoing training. Built to provide enhanced reasoning capabilities based on accumulated insights, it continues the evolution of DeepSeek's reasoning-focused architecture.
4 months newer

DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepSeek
2025-05-28

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
2025-10-15
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Haiku 4.5

DeepSeek-R1-0528
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks

Claude Haiku 4.5

DeepSeek-R1-0528
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude Haiku 4.5

DeepSeek-R1-0528
Claude Haiku 4.5
2025-02-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

DeepSeek-R1-0528

Claude Haiku 4.5

DeepSeek-R1-0528

Claude Haiku 4.5

DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepInfra
DeepSeek
Novita