Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads with 7.8% higher average benchmark score. Claude Haiku 4.5 offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B. DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is $5.50 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5 continues Anthropic's tradition of fast, efficient models in the fourth generation Claude family. Designed to maintain the hallmark speed and cost-effectiveness of the Haiku line while incorporating advancements from the Claude 4 series, it serves applications requiring rapid processing and quick turnaround times.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B was created through knowledge distillation from DeepSeek-R1 into a Llama-based architecture, designed to transfer reasoning capabilities to a widely-used open-source foundation. Built to combine DeepSeek's reasoning innovations with Llama's ecosystem compatibility, it enables broader access to advanced reasoning techniques.
8 months newer

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
2025-10-15
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Haiku 4.5

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude Haiku 4.5

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
Claude Haiku 4.5
2025-02-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

Claude Haiku 4.5

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

Claude Haiku 4.5

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
DeepInfra