Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads with 15.4% higher average benchmark score. Claude Haiku 4.5 offers 72.3K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V3.1. DeepSeek-V3.1 is $4.73 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5 continues Anthropic's tradition of fast, efficient models in the fourth generation Claude family. Designed to maintain the hallmark speed and cost-effectiveness of the Haiku line while incorporating advancements from the Claude 4 series, it serves applications requiring rapid processing and quick turnaround times.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1 was developed as an incremental advancement over DeepSeek-V3, designed to refine the mixture-of-experts architecture with improved training techniques. Built to enhance quality and efficiency while maintaining the open-source philosophy, it represents continued iteration on DeepSeek's flagship model line.
9 months newer

DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek
2025-01-10

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
2025-10-15
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Haiku 4.5

DeepSeek-V3.1
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks

Claude Haiku 4.5

DeepSeek-V3.1
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude Haiku 4.5

DeepSeek-V3.1
Claude Haiku 4.5
2025-02-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

DeepSeek-V3.1

Claude Haiku 4.5

DeepSeek-V3.1

Claude Haiku 4.5

DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepInfra
Novita