Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads with 19.7% higher average benchmark score. Claude Haiku 4.5 offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Devstral Small 1.1. Devstral Small 1.1 is $5.60 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5 continues Anthropic's tradition of fast, efficient models in the fourth generation Claude family. Designed to maintain the hallmark speed and cost-effectiveness of the Haiku line while incorporating advancements from the Claude 4 series, it serves applications requiring rapid processing and quick turnaround times.
Mistral AI
Devstral Small was developed as a more efficient development-focused model, designed to bring software engineering assistance to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide coding capabilities with reduced computational requirements, it enables developer tools in environments where efficiency is paramount.
3 months newer

Devstral Small 1.1
Mistral AI
2025-07-11

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
2025-10-15
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Haiku 4.5

Devstral Small 1.1
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude Haiku 4.5

Devstral Small 1.1
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude Haiku 4.5

Devstral Small 1.1
Claude Haiku 4.5
2025-02-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

Devstral Small 1.1

Claude Haiku 4.5

Devstral Small 1.1

Claude Haiku 4.5

Devstral Small 1.1
Mistral AI