Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads with 10.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash offers 656.8K more tokens in context window than Claude Haiku 4.5. Gemini 2.0 Flash is $5.50 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5 continues Anthropic's tradition of fast, efficient models in the fourth generation Claude family. Designed to maintain the hallmark speed and cost-effectiveness of the Haiku line while incorporating advancements from the Claude 4 series, it serves applications requiring rapid processing and quick turnaround times.
Gemini 2.0 Flash was developed as the next generation of Google's fast multimodal model, designed to provide improved performance while maintaining the speed and efficiency that defines the Flash family. Built with enhanced reasoning and generation capabilities, it serves applications requiring both quality and responsiveness.
10 months newer

Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
2025-10-15
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Haiku 4.5

Gemini 2.0 Flash
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude Haiku 4.5

Gemini 2.0 Flash
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
Claude Haiku 4.5
2025-02-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Claude Haiku 4.5

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Claude Haiku 4.5

Gemini 2.0 Flash