Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads with 21.5% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite offers 656.8K more tokens in context window than Claude Haiku 4.5. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is $5.63 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5 continues Anthropic's tradition of fast, efficient models in the fourth generation Claude family. Designed to maintain the hallmark speed and cost-effectiveness of the Haiku line while incorporating advancements from the Claude 4 series, it serves applications requiring rapid processing and quick turnaround times.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
8 months newer

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
2025-10-15
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Haiku 4.5

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude Haiku 4.5

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
Claude Haiku 4.5
2025-02-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Claude Haiku 4.5

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Claude Haiku 4.5

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite