Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads with 32.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite offers 714.1K more tokens in context window than Claude Haiku 4.5. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is $5.50 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5 continues Anthropic's tradition of fast, efficient models in the fourth generation Claude family. Designed to maintain the hallmark speed and cost-effectiveness of the Haiku line while incorporating advancements from the Claude 4 series, it serves applications requiring rapid processing and quick turnaround times.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was created as the most efficient option in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed to provide cutting-edge capabilities with minimal computational overhead. Built for applications where cost and latency are primary concerns, it extends advanced multimodal understanding to resource-conscious deployments.
4 months newer

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
2025-10-15
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Haiku 4.5

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks

Claude Haiku 4.5

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude Haiku 4.5

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
Claude Haiku 4.5
2025-02-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Claude Haiku 4.5

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Claude Haiku 4.5

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite