+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemma 3 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads with 30.6% higher average benchmark score. Claude Haiku 4.5 offers 137.9K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 27B. Gemma 3 27B is $5.70 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5 continues Anthropic's tradition of fast, efficient models in the fourth generation Claude family. Designed to maintain the hallmark speed and cost-effectiveness of the Haiku line while incorporating advancements from the Claude 4 series, it serves applications requiring rapid processing and quick turnaround times.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
7 months newer
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
2025-10-15
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Input:$1.00
Output:$5.00
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($5.70 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Average Score:73.0%(+30.6%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:42.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
1 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Avg Score:73.0%(+30.6%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:42.4%
Providers:2