+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GLM-4.5-Air
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads with 8.2% higher average benchmark score. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5 continues Anthropic's tradition of fast, efficient models in the fourth generation Claude family. Designed to maintain the hallmark speed and cost-effectiveness of the Haiku line while incorporating advancements from the Claude 4 series, it serves applications requiring rapid processing and quick turnaround times.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 Air was created as a lightweight variant of GLM-4.5, designed to provide strong bilingual capabilities with improved efficiency. Built to serve applications requiring practical deployment with reduced resource requirements, it extends GLM-4.5's multilingual strengths to resource-conscious scenarios.
2 months newer
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
2025-10-15
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Average Score:62.4%(+8.2%)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:54.2%
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Coding73.3%(+15.7%)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Coding57.6%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
1 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Avg Score:62.4%(+8.2%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:54.2%
Providers:0