+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-3.5 Turbo
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads with 42.2% higher average benchmark score. Claude Haiku 4.5 offers 379.5K more tokens in context window than GPT-3.5 Turbo. GPT-3.5 Turbo is $4.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5 continues Anthropic's tradition of fast, efficient models in the fourth generation Claude family. Designed to maintain the hallmark speed and cost-effectiveness of the Haiku line while incorporating advancements from the Claude 4 series, it serves applications requiring rapid processing and quick turnaround times.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-3.5 Turbo was developed as an optimized version of GPT-3.5, designed to provide a balance of capability and efficiency for conversational and completion tasks. Built to serve as a cost-effective option for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it became widely adopted for chatbots, content generation, and general-purpose AI assistance.
2 years newer
GPT-3.5 Turbo
OpenAI
2023-03-21
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
2025-10-15
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Input:$1.00
Output:$5.00
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Input:$0.50
Output:$1.50($4.00 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Average Score:73.0%(+42.2%)
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Average Score:30.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2021-09-30
Claude Haiku 4.5
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
1 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Avg Score:73.0%(+42.2%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Avg Score:30.8%
Providers:2