+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Kimi K2 0905
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 0905 leads with 2.8% higher average benchmark score. Kimi K2 0905 offers 124.3K more tokens in context window than Claude Haiku 4.5. Kimi K2 0905 is $2.90 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5 continues Anthropic's tradition of fast, efficient models in the fourth generation Claude family. Designed to maintain the hallmark speed and cost-effectiveness of the Haiku line while incorporating advancements from the Claude 4 series, it serves applications requiring rapid processing and quick turnaround times.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 was introduced as the second generation of Moonshot's language model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities across language understanding and generation. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in Moonshot's model offerings.
1 month newer
Kimi K2 0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
2025-10-15
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Input:$1.00
Output:$5.00
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.50($2.90 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Average Score:73.0%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Average Score:75.8%(+2.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
1 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Avg Score:73.0%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Avg Score:75.8%(+2.8%)
Providers:2