+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Kimi K2 Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads with 24.9% higher average benchmark score. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5 continues Anthropic's tradition of fast, efficient models in the fourth generation Claude family. Designed to maintain the hallmark speed and cost-effectiveness of the Haiku line while incorporating advancements from the Claude 4 series, it serves applications requiring rapid processing and quick turnaround times.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Base was created as the foundation model in the K2 series, designed to serve as a starting point for fine-tuning and customization. Built to provide strong base capabilities for domain-specific applications, it enables developers to build specialized solutions on Moonshot's architecture.
3 months newer
Kimi K2 Base
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
2025-10-15
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Average Score:73.0%(+24.9%)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
Average Score:48.1%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
1 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Avg Score:73.0%(+24.9%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
Avg Score:48.1%
Providers:0