Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads with 13.5% higher average benchmark score. Claude Haiku 4.5 offers 137.9K more tokens in context window than Kimi K2 Instruct. Kimi K2 Instruct is $3.13 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5 continues Anthropic's tradition of fast, efficient models in the fourth generation Claude family. Designed to maintain the hallmark speed and cost-effectiveness of the Haiku line while incorporating advancements from the Claude 4 series, it serves applications requiring rapid processing and quick turnaround times.
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Kimi K2, designed to follow user instructions reliably across diverse tasks. Built to serve general-purpose conversational and task-completion applications, it provides Moonshot's accessible interface for language AI.
3 months newer

Kimi K2 Instruct
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
2025-10-15
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Haiku 4.5

Kimi K2 Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks

Claude Haiku 4.5

Kimi K2 Instruct
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude Haiku 4.5

Kimi K2 Instruct
Claude Haiku 4.5
2025-02-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

Kimi K2 Instruct

Claude Haiku 4.5

Kimi K2 Instruct

Claude Haiku 4.5

Kimi K2 Instruct
Novita