+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads with 15.0% higher average benchmark score. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5 continues Anthropic's tradition of fast, efficient models in the fourth generation Claude family. Designed to maintain the hallmark speed and cost-effectiveness of the Haiku line while incorporating advancements from the Claude 4 series, it serves applications requiring rapid processing and quick turnaround times.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct-0905 represents a specific release iteration of the K2 Instruct model, developed to incorporate refinements and improvements. Built to provide enhanced instruction-following based on deployment feedback, it continues the evolution of Moonshot's instruction-tuned offerings.
1 month newer
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
2025-10-15
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Average Score:73.3%(+15.0%)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Average Score:58.3%
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Coding73.3%(+7.5%)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Coding65.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
1 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Avg Score:73.3%(+15.0%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Avg Score:58.3%
Providers:0