Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads with 22.3% higher average benchmark score. Claude Haiku 4.5 offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.1 405B Instruct. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is $4.22 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is available on 8 providers. Overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5 continues Anthropic's tradition of fast, efficient models in the fourth generation Claude family. Designed to maintain the hallmark speed and cost-effectiveness of the Haiku line while incorporating advancements from the Claude 4 series, it serves applications requiring rapid processing and quick turnaround times.
Meta
Llama 3.1 405B was developed as Meta's largest open-source language model, designed to provide frontier-level capabilities with 405 billion parameters. Built to demonstrate that open-source models can match proprietary systems in capability, it enables researchers and developers to experiment with and deploy a powerful foundation model without licensing restrictions.
1 year newer

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
2025-10-15
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Haiku 4.5

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude Haiku 4.5

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Claude Haiku 4.5
2025-02-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

Claude Haiku 4.5

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

Claude Haiku 4.5

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Bedrock
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Replicate
Together