Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads with 31.3% higher average benchmark score. Claude Haiku 4.5 offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.1 70B Instruct. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is $5.60 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5 continues Anthropic's tradition of fast, efficient models in the fourth generation Claude family. Designed to maintain the hallmark speed and cost-effectiveness of the Haiku line while incorporating advancements from the Claude 4 series, it serves applications requiring rapid processing and quick turnaround times.
Meta
Llama 3.1 70B was created as a balanced open-source model, designed to provide strong performance with 70 billion parameters while remaining practical for many deployment scenarios. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for fine-tuning and application development, it combines capability with accessibility in the open-source ecosystem.
1 year newer

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
2025-10-15
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Haiku 4.5

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude Haiku 4.5

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Claude Haiku 4.5
2025-02-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Claude Haiku 4.5

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Claude Haiku 4.5

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together