Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads with 42.6% higher average benchmark score. Claude Haiku 4.5 offers 137.9K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.1 8B Instruct. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is $5.94 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5 continues Anthropic's tradition of fast, efficient models in the fourth generation Claude family. Designed to maintain the hallmark speed and cost-effectiveness of the Haiku line while incorporating advancements from the Claude 4 series, it serves applications requiring rapid processing and quick turnaround times.
Meta
Llama 3.1 8B was developed as an efficient open-source model, designed to bring capable instruction-following to applications with limited computational resources. Built with 8 billion parameters, it provides a lightweight option for developers seeking reliable performance without the overhead of larger models.
1 year newer

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
2025-10-15
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Haiku 4.5

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude Haiku 4.5

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
2023-12-31
Claude Haiku 4.5
2025-02-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Claude Haiku 4.5

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Claude Haiku 4.5

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together