Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads with 40.2% higher average benchmark score. Claude Haiku 4.5 offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is $5.90 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is available on 6 providers. Overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5 continues Anthropic's tradition of fast, efficient models in the fourth generation Claude family. Designed to maintain the hallmark speed and cost-effectiveness of the Haiku line while incorporating advancements from the Claude 4 series, it serves applications requiring rapid processing and quick turnaround times.
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B was introduced as a mid-sized variant in the Llama 3.2 family, designed to offer enhanced capabilities while maintaining efficiency. Built to provide a balanced option for applications requiring more than lightweight models but less than flagship sizes, it serves diverse use cases in the open-source community.
1 year newer

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
2025-10-15
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Haiku 4.5

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude Haiku 4.5

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
2023-12-31
Claude Haiku 4.5
2025-02-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Claude Haiku 4.5

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Claude Haiku 4.5

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Bedrock
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Sambanova
Together