Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads with 26.3% higher average benchmark score. Claude Haiku 4.5 offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 90B Instruct. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is $5.25 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is available on 5 providers. Overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5 continues Anthropic's tradition of fast, efficient models in the fourth generation Claude family. Designed to maintain the hallmark speed and cost-effectiveness of the Haiku line while incorporating advancements from the Claude 4 series, it serves applications requiring rapid processing and quick turnaround times.
Meta
Llama 3.2 90B was developed as a flagship-tier open-source model, designed to provide advanced capabilities with 90 billion parameters. Built to serve applications requiring high-quality reasoning and generation, it represents a powerful option within the Llama 3.2 series for demanding tasks.
1 year newer

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
2025-10-15
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Haiku 4.5

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude Haiku 4.5

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Claude Haiku 4.5
2025-02-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Claude Haiku 4.5

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Claude Haiku 4.5

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Bedrock
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Hyperbolic
Together