+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads with 22.1% higher average benchmark score. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5 continues Anthropic's tradition of fast, efficient models in the fourth generation Claude family. Designed to maintain the hallmark speed and cost-effectiveness of the Haiku line while incorporating advancements from the Claude 4 series, it serves applications requiring rapid processing and quick turnaround times.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B was created through NVIDIA's optimization of Llama 3.3, designed to provide a balanced option with 49 billion parameters. Built to serve as a versatile mid-to-large-scale offering, it combines NVIDIA's customization expertise with Meta's foundation architecture.
7 months newer
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
2025-10-15
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Average Score:84.7%(+22.1%)
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Average Score:62.5%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
2023-12-31
Claude Haiku 4.5
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
1 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Avg Score:84.7%(+22.1%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Avg Score:62.5%
Providers:0