+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 4 Scout
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads with 15.8% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout offers 19.6M more tokens in context window than Claude Haiku 4.5. Llama 4 Scout is $5.62 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 4 Scout is available on 6 providers. Overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5 continues Anthropic's tradition of fast, efficient models in the fourth generation Claude family. Designed to maintain the hallmark speed and cost-effectiveness of the Haiku line while incorporating advancements from the Claude 4 series, it serves applications requiring rapid processing and quick turnaround times.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Scout was created as an exploratory variant in the Llama 4 family, designed to investigate new architectures and optimization strategies. Built as part of Meta's commitment to advancing open-source AI, it serves as a testbed for innovations that may inform future model releases.
6 months newer
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
2025-10-15
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Input:$1.00
Output:$5.00
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Input:$0.08
Output:$0.30($5.62 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Average Score:73.0%(+15.8%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Average Score:57.2%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
1 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Avg Score:73.0%(+15.8%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Avg Score:57.2%
Providers:6