+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Mistral NeMo Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 offers 144.0K more tokens in context window than Mistral NeMo Instruct. Mistral NeMo Instruct is $5.70 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5 continues Anthropic's tradition of fast, efficient models in the fourth generation Claude family. Designed to maintain the hallmark speed and cost-effectiveness of the Haiku line while incorporating advancements from the Claude 4 series, it serves applications requiring rapid processing and quick turnaround times.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability with efficiency for practical deployments. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for various applications, it provides reliable performance across general language understanding and generation tasks.
1 year newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
2025-10-15
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Input:$1.00
Output:$5.00
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($5.70 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
1 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:2