+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads with 27.0% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5 continues Anthropic's tradition of fast, efficient models in the fourth generation Claude family. Designed to maintain the hallmark speed and cost-effectiveness of the Haiku line while incorporating advancements from the Claude 4 series, it serves applications requiring rapid processing and quick turnaround times.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of the 3.1 base model, designed to deliver improved instruction-following with refinements from the updated architecture. Built to serve diverse applications with enhanced reliability, it advances the Small model line's capabilities.
7 months newer
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
2025-10-15
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Average Score:73.0%(+27.0%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Average Score:46.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
1 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Avg Score:73.0%(+27.0%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Avg Score:46.0%
Providers:0