+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Nova Lite
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads with 31.0% higher average benchmark score. Claude Haiku 4.5 offers 98.0K more tokens in context window than Nova Lite. Nova Lite is $5.70 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5 continues Anthropic's tradition of fast, efficient models in the fourth generation Claude family. Designed to maintain the hallmark speed and cost-effectiveness of the Haiku line while incorporating advancements from the Claude 4 series, it serves applications requiring rapid processing and quick turnaround times.
+
+
+
+
Amazon
Amazon Nova Lite was developed as a lightweight multimodal model, designed to provide efficient AI capabilities for text and image understanding. Built to serve cost-sensitive applications with quick response times, it represents Amazon's entry-level offering in the Nova family.
10 months newer
Nova Lite
Amazon
2024-11-20
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
2025-10-15
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Input:$1.00
Output:$5.00
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
Input:$0.06
Output:$0.24($5.70 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Average Score:73.0%(+31.0%)
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
Average Score:42.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
1 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Avg Score:73.0%(+31.0%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
Avg Score:42.0%
Providers:1