+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads with 35.9% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5 continues Anthropic's tradition of fast, efficient models in the fourth generation Claude family. Designed to maintain the hallmark speed and cost-effectiveness of the Haiku line while incorporating advancements from the Claude 4 series, it serves applications requiring rapid processing and quick turnaround times.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-VL 32B was developed as a mid-sized vision-language model, designed to balance multimodal capability with practical deployment considerations. Built with 32 billion parameters for vision and language integration, it serves applications requiring strong visual understanding without flagship-scale resources.
7 months newer
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-02-28
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
2025-10-15
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Average Score:61.9%(+35.9%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Average Score:26.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
1 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Avg Score:61.9%(+35.9%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Avg Score:26.0%
Providers:0