Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads with 12.4% higher average benchmark score. Claude Haiku 4.5 offers 268.9K more tokens in context window than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is $4.35 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5 continues Anthropic's tradition of fast, efficient models in the fourth generation Claude family. Designed to maintain the hallmark speed and cost-effectiveness of the Haiku line while incorporating advancements from the Claude 4 series, it serves applications requiring rapid processing and quick turnaround times.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
1 month newer

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
2025-10-15
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Haiku 4.5

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks

Claude Haiku 4.5

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Claude Haiku 4.5
2025-02-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Claude Haiku 4.5

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Claude Haiku 4.5

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Novita