Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 10.0% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4.5 offers 32.0K more tokens in context window than Claude Opus 4.1. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is $72.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Opus 4.1 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.7% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (89.5%), TAU-bench Retail (82.4%), GPQA (80.9%). It supports a 232K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 75.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (89.1%), AIME 2025 (87.0%), TAU-bench Retail (86.2%). It supports a 264K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude Opus 4.1
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 10 common benchmarks
Claude Opus 4.1
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval
Claude Opus 4.1
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Claude Opus 4.1
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
ZeroEval