Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4.1 leads with 25.9% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B offers 24.0K more tokens in context window than Claude Opus 4.1. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is $89.70 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Opus 4.1 supports multimodal inputs. Claude Opus 4.1 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.7% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (89.5%), TAU-bench Retail (82.4%), GPQA (80.9%). It supports a 232K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.2% across 4 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (94.3%), AIME 2024 (83.3%), GPQA (62.1%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude Opus 4.1
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 11 common benchmarks
Claude Opus 4.1
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval
Claude Opus 4.1
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Claude Opus 4.1
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepInfra