Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek VL2 leads with 18.7% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek VL2 offers 26.6K more tokens in context window than Claude Opus 4.1. Claude Opus 4.1 is $4719.50 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Opus 4.1 is available on 4 providers. Overall, DeepSeek VL2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.7% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (89.5%), TAU-bench Retail (82.4%), GPQA (80.9%). It supports a 232K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 is a multimodal language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 70.9% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (93.3%), ChartQA (86.0%), TextVQA (84.2%). It supports a 259K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
7 months newer
DeepSeek VL2
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude Opus 4.1
DeepSeek VL2
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 22 common benchmarks
Claude Opus 4.1
DeepSeek VL2
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval
Claude Opus 4.1
DeepSeek VL2
Claude Opus 4.1
DeepSeek VL2
DeepSeek VL2
Replicate