+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Opus 4.1 vs DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny leads with 13.7% higher average benchmark score. Claude Opus 4.1 is available on 4 providers. Overall, DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.7% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (89.5%), TAU-bench Retail (82.4%), GPQA (80.9%). It supports a 232K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is a multimodal language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.1% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (88.9%), ChartQA (81.0%), OCRBench (80.9%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
7 months newer
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 22 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
Average Score:26.4%
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Average Score:40.2%(+13.7%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
Avg Score:26.4%
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Avg Score:40.2%(+13.7%)
Providers:0