+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Opus 4.1 vs Gemma 3n E4B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3n E4B leads with 6.8% higher average benchmark score. Claude Opus 4.1 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Gemma 3n E4B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.7% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (89.5%), TAU-bench Retail (82.4%), GPQA (80.9%). It supports a 232K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (81.6%), BoolQ (81.6%), PIQA (81.0%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Gemma 3n E4B
2025-06-26
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 19 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
Average Score:30.6%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Average Score:37.4%(+6.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
Avg Score:30.6%
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Avg Score:37.4%(+6.8%)
Providers:0