Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4.1 leads with 13.9% higher average benchmark score. Claude Opus 4.1 offers 35.4K more tokens in context window than GLM-4.6. GLM-4.6 is $87.40 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Opus 4.1 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.7% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (89.5%), TAU-bench Retail (82.4%), GPQA (80.9%). It supports a 232K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.6 is a multimodal language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 61.2% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AIME 2025 (93.9%), LiveCodeBench v6 (82.8%), GPQA (81.0%). It supports a 197K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
GLM-4.6
Zhipu AI
2025-09-30
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude Opus 4.1
GLM-4.6
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 11 common benchmarks
Claude Opus 4.1
GLM-4.6
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval
Claude Opus 4.1
GLM-4.6
Claude Opus 4.1
GLM-4.6
GLM-4.6
DeepInfra
ZeroEval