Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4 leads with 18.5% higher average benchmark score. Claude Opus 4.1 offers 166.5K more tokens in context window than GPT-4. Both models have similar pricing. Claude Opus 4.1 is available on 4 providers. Overall, GPT-4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.7% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (89.5%), TAU-bench Retail (82.4%), GPQA (80.9%). It supports a 232K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
OpenAI
GPT-4 is a multimodal language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 77.7% across 12 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC) (96.3%), HellaSwag (95.3%), Uniform Bar Exam (90.0%). The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly.
2 years newer
GPT-4
OpenAI
2023-06-13
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude Opus 4.1
GPT-4
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 19 common benchmarks
Claude Opus 4.1
GPT-4
GPT-4
2022-12-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval
Claude Opus 4.1
GPT-4
Claude Opus 4.1
GPT-4
GPT-4
Azure
OpenAI