Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4.1 nano leads with 9.4% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 nano offers 848.3K more tokens in context window than Claude Opus 4.1. GPT-4.1 nano is $89.50 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Opus 4.1 is available on 4 providers. Overall, GPT-4.1 nano is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.7% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (89.5%), TAU-bench Retail (82.4%), GPQA (80.9%). It supports a 232K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 nano is a multimodal language model developed by OpenAI. The model shows competitive results across 25 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (80.1%), IFEval (74.5%), CharXiv-D (73.9%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
GPT-4.1 nano
OpenAI
2025-04-14
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude Opus 4.1
GPT-4.1 nano
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 29 common benchmarks
Claude Opus 4.1
GPT-4.1 nano
GPT-4.1 nano
2024-05-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval
Claude Opus 4.1
GPT-4.1 nano
Claude Opus 4.1
GPT-4.1 nano
GPT-4.1 nano
OpenAI