Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Instruct leads with 45.8% higher average benchmark score. Kimi K2 Instruct offers 30.1K more tokens in context window than Claude Opus 4.1. Kimi K2 Instruct is $87.13 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Opus 4.1 supports multimodal inputs. Claude Opus 4.1 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Kimi K2 Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.7% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (89.5%), TAU-bench Retail (82.4%), GPQA (80.9%). It supports a 232K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct is a language model developed by Moonshot AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.7% across 38 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (97.4%), GSM8k (97.3%), CBNSL (95.6%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Moonshot AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
25 days newer
Kimi K2 Instruct
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude Opus 4.1
Kimi K2 Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 39 common benchmarks
Claude Opus 4.1
Kimi K2 Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval
Claude Opus 4.1
Kimi K2 Instruct
Claude Opus 4.1
Kimi K2 Instruct
Kimi K2 Instruct
Novita