Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct leads with 8.7% higher average benchmark score. Claude Opus 4.1 supports multimodal inputs. Claude Opus 4.1 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.7% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (89.5%), TAU-bench Retail (82.4%), GPQA (80.9%). It supports a 232K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.9% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (91.4%), HellaSwag (85.6%), Winogrande (84.5%). Released in 2024, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
10 months newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
2024-10-01
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 19 common benchmarks
Claude Opus 4.1
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
2023-12-01
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval
Claude Opus 4.1
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Claude Opus 4.1
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct