Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4.1 leads with 5.9% higher average benchmark score. Claude Opus 4.1 supports multimodal inputs. Claude Opus 4.1 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.7% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (89.5%), TAU-bench Retail (82.4%), GPQA (80.9%). It supports a 232K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.2% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (95.4%), MBPP (84.6%), MT-Bench (81.0%). Released in 2025, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 13 common benchmarks
Claude Opus 4.1
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
2023-12-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval
Claude Opus 4.1
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Claude Opus 4.1
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1