Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct leads with 11.5% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct offers 24.0K more tokens in context window than Claude Opus 4.1. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is $89.97 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Opus 4.1 supports multimodal inputs. Claude Opus 4.1 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.7% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (89.5%), TAU-bench Retail (82.4%), GPQA (80.9%). It supports a 232K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. The model shows competitive results across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in NIH/Multi-needle (84.7%), ARC-C (78.6%), GSM8k (77.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
10 months newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude Opus 4.1
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 22 common benchmarks
Claude Opus 4.1
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval
Claude Opus 4.1
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Claude Opus 4.1
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
DeepInfra