Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Maverick leads with 17.6% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Maverick offers 1.8M more tokens in context window than Claude Opus 4.1. Llama 4 Maverick is $89.23 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 4 Maverick is available on 7 providers. Overall, Llama 4 Maverick is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.7% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (89.5%), TAU-bench Retail (82.4%), GPQA (80.9%). It supports a 232K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.8% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (94.4%), MGSM (92.3%), ChartQA (90.0%). With a 2.0M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 7 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
2025-04-05
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude Opus 4.1
Llama 4 Maverick
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 20 common benchmarks
Claude Opus 4.1
Llama 4 Maverick
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval
Claude Opus 4.1
Llama 4 Maverick
Claude Opus 4.1
Llama 4 Maverick
Llama 4 Maverick
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Lambda
Novita
Sambanova
Together