+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Opus 4.1 vs o1-pro
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4.1 leads with 46.3% higher average benchmark score. Claude Opus 4.1 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.7% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (89.5%), TAU-bench Retail (82.4%), GPQA (80.9%). It supports a 232K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-pro is a multimodal language model developed by OpenAI. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 82.5% across 2 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AIME 2024 (86.0%), GPQA (79.0%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
7 months newer
o1-pro
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 9 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
Average Score:64.6%(+46.3%)
+
+
+
+
o1-pro
Average Score:18.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o1-pro
2023-09-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
Avg Score:64.6%(+46.3%)
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
o1-pro
Avg Score:18.3%
Providers:0