+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Opus 4.1 vs Qwen2 72B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2 72B Instruct leads with 27.9% higher average benchmark score. Claude Opus 4.1 supports multimodal inputs. Claude Opus 4.1 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Qwen2 72B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.7% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (89.5%), TAU-bench Retail (82.4%), GPQA (80.9%). It supports a 232K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2 72B Instruct is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 73.6% across 17 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (91.1%), CMMLU (90.1%), HellaSwag (87.6%). Released in 2024, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-07-23
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 24 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
Average Score:24.2%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Average Score:52.1%(+27.9%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
Avg Score:24.2%
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Avg Score:52.1%(+27.9%)
Providers:0