Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Both models show comparable benchmark performance. Claude Opus 4 offers 96.0K more tokens in context window than Claude Opus 4.1. Both models have similar pricing. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (88.8%), TAU-bench Retail (81.4%), GPQA (79.6%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.7% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (89.5%), TAU-bench Retail (82.4%), GPQA (80.9%). It supports a 232K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude Opus 4
Claude Opus 4.1
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 9 common benchmarks
Claude Opus 4
Claude Opus 4.1
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval
Claude Opus 4
Claude Opus 4.1
Claude Opus 4
Claude Opus 4.1
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval