Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 9.1% higher average benchmark score. Claude Opus 4 offers 64.0K more tokens in context window than Claude Sonnet 4.5. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is $72.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Opus 4 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (88.8%), TAU-bench Retail (81.4%), GPQA (79.6%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 75.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (89.1%), AIME 2025 (87.0%), TAU-bench Retail (86.2%). It supports a 264K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude Opus 4
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 11 common benchmarks
Claude Opus 4
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval
Claude Opus 4
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Claude Opus 4
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
ZeroEval