Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-R1-0528 leads with 17.5% higher average benchmark score. Claude Opus 4 offers 65.9K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-R1-0528. DeepSeek-R1-0528 is $87.35 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Opus 4 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, DeepSeek-R1-0528 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (88.8%), TAU-bench Retail (81.4%), GPQA (79.6%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528 is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.1% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU-Redux (93.4%), SimpleQA (92.3%), AIME 2024 (91.4%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 days newer
Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepSeek
2025-05-28
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude Opus 4
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 20 common benchmarks
Claude Opus 4
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval
Claude Opus 4
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Claude Opus 4
DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepInfra
DeepSeek
Novita