+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Opus 4 vs DeepSeek R1 Zero
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4 leads with 23.0% higher average benchmark score. Claude Opus 4 supports multimodal inputs. Claude Opus 4 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude Opus 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (88.8%), TAU-bench Retail (81.4%), GPQA (79.6%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Zero is a language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 76.5% across 4 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (95.9%), AIME 2024 (86.7%), GPQA (73.3%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
DeepSeek R1 Zero
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 12 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
Average Score:48.5%(+23.0%)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Zero
Average Score:25.5%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
Avg Score:48.5%(+23.0%)
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek R1 Zero
Avg Score:25.5%
Providers:0