Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4 leads with 10.7% higher average benchmark score. Claude Opus 4 offers 65.9K more tokens in context window than GPT OSS 120B. GPT OSS 120B is $89.46 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Opus 4 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Opus 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (88.8%), TAU-bench Retail (81.4%), GPQA (79.6%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 61.7% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (90.0%), CodeForces (87.4%), GPQA (80.1%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 5 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
GPT OSS 120B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude Opus 4
GPT OSS 120B
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 14 common benchmarks
Claude Opus 4
GPT OSS 120B
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval
Claude Opus 4
GPT OSS 120B
Claude Opus 4
GPT OSS 120B
GPT OSS 120B
DeepInfra
Groq
Novita
OpenAI
ZeroEval