Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4 leads with 3.6% higher average benchmark score. Jamba 1.5 Large offers 184.0K more tokens in context window than Claude Opus 4. Jamba 1.5 Large is $80.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Opus 4 supports multimodal inputs. Claude Opus 4 is available on 4 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (88.8%), TAU-bench Retail (81.4%), GPQA (79.6%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large is a language model developed by AI21 Labs. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.5% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (93.0%), GSM8k (87.0%), MMLU (81.2%). It supports a 512K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents AI21 Labs's latest advancement in AI technology.
9 months newer
Jamba 1.5 Large
AI21 Labs
2024-08-22
Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude Opus 4
Jamba 1.5 Large
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 16 common benchmarks
Claude Opus 4
Jamba 1.5 Large
Jamba 1.5 Large
2024-03-05
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval
Claude Opus 4
Jamba 1.5 Large
Claude Opus 4
Jamba 1.5 Large
Jamba 1.5 Large
Bedrock